Product walkthrough
The operating interface for benchmarked quality.
This is where Follicle Intelligence becomes operational: not a static report, but a command layer—executive posture, domain truth, cohort standing, governance queues, and controlled disclosure. What follows mirrors how teams actually use the surface when audit evidence, benchmarks, and standards have to agree.
Under the UI, the same intelligence core connects HairAudit surgical evidence, HLI longitudinal biology where integrated, and IIOHR-aligned methodology. The dashboard is how that compound signal becomes decisions.
Suggested visual
Full-width hero capture: logged-in home or workspace with executive tile, left nav, and tenant branding—annotate callouts for score, cohort, and queue count.
01 · Executive quality view
One number everyone agrees to interpret the same way.
The executive layer answers: are we within tolerance, improving, and aligned with the cohorts we care about—before anyone opens a case file.
Portfolio executive score
92.4
Vs cohort
+4.1 vs trailing 90-day mean
Rolling score trend · last 9 periods
Evidence completeness
High
Cohort membership
HT peer v2
Last adjudication
12 days ago
Suggested visual
Screenshot or zoomed mock: executive tile with trend sparkline and cohort badge; optional overlay arrows for 'score,' 'delta,' 'period.'
What you see
A single composite audit score (and trend) for the scope you select—surgeon, site, or group—with explicit cohort labels and evidence-completeness posture.
What it means
Leadership and clinical leads share one definition of “how good,” tied to structured evidence, not a spreadsheet debate.
What action it enables
Set internal targets, prioritize reviews, and decide what is safe to disclose externally once governance has run.
02 · Domain and score breakdowns
Where excellence and risk actually live.
Aggregates hide failure modes. Domain views expose which technical dimensions drive the headline—donor management, extraction, placement, documentation—so improvement has an address.
Domain breakdown
24 domainsLowest domain this period: Extraction integrity — drives review queue priority below.
Suggested visual
Side-by-side or stacked bars with tooltip mock: hovering 'extraction' shows definition and evidence sources counted toward the domain.
What you see
Per-domain scores with configurable weights; weak domains surface automatically relative to your baseline and peer cohort.
What it means
You see whether the problem is design, execution, or record-keeping—different owners, different fixes.
What action it enables
Assign targeted QA, peer review, or training modules; track whether the same domain recurs across cases.
03 · Cohort benchmarking and standing
Relative position you can defend.
Benchmarks turn scores into context: peer groups, historical baselines, and internal targets—so ‘good’ is defined, not assumed.
Top 18% · HT peer v2
Surgeon-level · last 120 cases
Cohort definitions are versioned. When membership rules change, standing is recomputed with an explicit breakpoint—so month-to-month movement reflects performance, not a silent denominator shift.
Suggested visual
Benchmark panel with percentile ribbon or ladder graphic; optional map or site list for multi-location operators.
What you see
Rank or band vs selected cohorts, plus internal targets; drift and rule-version notes where methodology changes.
What it means
Investors see proprietary cohort depth; buyers see whether marketing claims survive an internal benchmark.
What action it enables
Adjust targets, defend differentiation with evidence, or escalate when standing slips for multiple periods.
04 · Governance alerts and review queues
Exceptions before they become incidents.
Quality systems fail when outliers sit in inboxes. The surface prioritizes what needs human judgment—pattern breaks, incomplete evidence, repeated weak domains—and keeps an auditable trail.
Governance queue
P1 · Pattern break
Extraction integrity · 3 cases · same week
P2 · Evidence gap
Case HT-2401 · post-op set incomplete
P3 · Recurring domain
Documentation · below floor 2nd month
Suggested visual
Queue table mock with severity chips, assignee column, SLA clock—ideal for annotated product tour.
What you see
Prioritized items: statistical outliers, missing evidence, repeated weak domains—each row linkable to case evidence.
What it means
Governance is proactive; reputational risk is reduced because review happens before external narratives harden.
What action it enables
Assign reviewers, attach adjudication notes, and close the loop into training or policy updates.
05 · Reporting separation and disclosure controls
Internal truth and external story, explicitly separated.
Not every insight belongs in a patient-facing or public summary. The layer enforces which artifacts are internal-only, which are cleared for controlled disclosure, and which require sign-off—aligned with institutional policy.
Internal reporting
- ·Full domain breakdown, reviewer notes, and benchmark methodology footnotes
- ·Governance outcomes and training assignments tied to case IDs
External / public layer
- ·Summary score and banding only after adjudication state = cleared
- ·Optional patient-facing certificate language with fixed disclosure rules
Public view locked until governance queue clears for cohort HT-Q1.
Suggested visual
Split view or toggle: 'Internal' vs 'External preview' with watermark on draft public summary.
What you see
Distinct report objects and permissions: internal pack vs cleared external summary, with lock state visible in UI.
What it means
Trust: stakeholders know what was reviewed before anything leaves the organization.
What action it enables
Run disclosure reviews, export compliant summaries for partners or patients, and avoid accidental over-sharing.
Who uses this layer
Same surface, different decisive questions.
The command layer stays consistent; the job title changes what you optimize for—from technique to portfolio to standards.
Surgeon / clinical lead
Domain-level performance and defensible feedback loops.
Dr. Chen opens the executive tile for her rolling 90-day cohort: overall audit score, extraction integrity vs peers, and a short list of cases flagged for pattern review—not a generic “quality score,” but where her technique diverges from the benchmark she chose to hold herself against.
Clinic operator
Site standing, disclosure readiness, and internal assurance.
The clinic brand lead compares this month’s median score to the group’s internal target, checks the governance queue before any external reporting, and routes two cases to clinical review—so public-facing claims stay aligned with adjudicated evidence.
Group operator
Portfolio drift, capital allocation, and cross-site consistency.
A network COO views cohort standing by region and surgeon tier, spots a site whose donor-management scores lag peers, and opens a portfolio action: targeted training budget and a follow-up audit window—signal-driven, not survey-driven.
Standards / review body
Traceability, review pathways, and methodology alignment.
An IIOHR-aligned reviewer sees separation between internal adjudication and any public summary, exports a structured case packet for committee review, and ties findings back to training modules—without raw operational noise in the institutional record.
Scenario
From deviation to decision—in one system.
A realistic path through the layer when quality signal breaks from expectation. Names and IDs are illustrative.
- 1
Signal
Weekly cohort review shows extraction integrity for surgeon A drops from the 88–91 band to 79–83 over ten cases—domain view, not headline score alone.
- 2
Triage
Governance queue auto-prioritizes a P1 pattern break: three cases in five days below the extraction floor. Cases HT-2388, HT-2394, HT-2401 attach with evidence thumbnails.
- 3
Review
Lead reviewer locks an internal adjudication pack; peer comment added. Public reporting remains locked for that surgeon’s public tile until cleared.
- 4
Route
Outcome: targeted FUE mechanics refresher assigned via IIOHR-aligned training module; second-line QA on next fifteen cases. Portfolio view shows the site operator a single action item with owner and due date.
Suggested visual
Storyboard strip: four panels (domain chart dip → queue screenshot → review modal → training assignment) for sales deck or product marketing.
This walkthrough is representative of how Follicle Intelligence is meant to be deployed: one command layer for benchmarked quality, not a chart library bolted onto a database.
Live demos cover tenant configuration, cohort rule sets, reviewer permissions, and export behavior—aligned to your governance model.
Follicle Intelligence™ connects HairAudit (surgical evidence and audit surface), Hair Longevity Institute (biology and longitudinal treatment intelligence), and IIOHR (methodology, training, standards, and governance alignment).